Explore our Decision Science & Technology focused seminar series advancing the practice of mediation and negotiation.
Focus on the platform's online dispute resolution capabilities. Demonstrates how visualization improves attention, understanding, and commitment in remote settings and in an age of attention span decline.
Target Audience: Online dispute resolution professionals, government agencies, international ADR users
RegisterTrace the history of decision science in conflict resolution, from its early academic applications in the 1970s to its growing role in mediation and negotiation today. Introduce attendees to multi-criteria decision-making methods such as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), originally developed to structure complex choices, and show how NextLevel™ Mediation builds on this tradition to quantify priorities and reduce emotional bias. Demonstrate how tools such as priority models and structured comparisons clarify complex interests in both legal and interpersonal disputes, helping neutrals surface underlying values and suggest balanced alternatives.
Target Audience: Mediators, attorneys, legal educators, HR professionals
RegisterDiscover how the power of game theory can transform the way conflicts are resolved. This session explores how NextLevel™ applies game-theoretic strategies, especially the Adjusted Winner Procedure, to design fair, win-win outcomes in divorce, business partnership, and asset disputes. Attendees will see live demonstrations of allocation algorithms in action, revealing how complex negotiations can be broken down into clear, equitable solutions. Learn how these methods not only reduce tension but also build confidence in the fairness of the process.
Target Audience: Divorce/family mediators, estate planners, business advisors
RegisterExplore how Next Level Mediation’s Litigation Risk Analysis Tool helps mediators, attorneys, and dispute resolution professionals make informed, data-driven decisions. The system evaluates Expected Monetary Value (EMV), Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA), Worst Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (WATNA), and incorporates time-based factors to create a complete picture of risk. By modeling outcomes and visualizing probabilities, the tool enables more strategic negotiations, clearer client guidance, and better-prepared settlements.
Target Audience: Mediators, arbitration professionals, attorneys, and dispute program managers who want to integrate objective, data-driven risk assessment into their case strategy.
Register